Legal Opinion
Christle v. Marberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 12, 1988No. C8-87-1548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, * Judge.
Appellant contests the trial court’s foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien on her property. Because the property was wholly residential in nature, pre-lien notice was required under Minn.Stat. § 514.011, subd. 4c. Since no pre-lien notice was given, we reverse.
FACTS
This action entails the establishment and attachment of a mechanics’ lien on property of appellant Mildred Thiede-Hutton to reimburse respondent James Christie for improvements to the property.
In 1980, a purchase agreement was signed involving the conveyance of approximately five acres near St. Cloud.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. NationsBank of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- C. Kowalski, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hesselgrave v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Norwest Equipment Finance, Inc. v. NathCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.