Karl Krahl Excavating Co. v. Goldman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Appeal from a judgment of the district court directing foreclosure of a mechanics lien upon property owned by several of the defendants and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found the facts to be in favor of plaintiff, Karl Krahl Excavating Company (Krahl), and against defendant landowners and general contractor. A counterclaim made by the defendants was disallowed. Judgment was entered for Krahl in the full amount of its $23,656.50 claim, plus interest, together with costs and $2,500 attorneys' fees.
1. The principal issue presented by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Thompson v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Smude v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Arendt & Wartman v. VossenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by17 opinions
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Hayle Floor Covering, Inc. v. First Minnesota Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC v. CopoulsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.