Legal Opinion

Karl Krahl Excavating Co. v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1973No. 43580PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from a judgment of the district court directing foreclosure of a mechanics lien upon property owned by several of the defendants and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found the facts to be in favor of plaintiff, Karl Krahl Excavating Company (Krahl), and against defendant landowners and general contractor. A counterclaim made by the defendants was disallowed. Judgment was entered for Krahl in the full amount of its $23,656.50 claim, plus interest, together with costs and $2,500 attorneys' fees.

1. The principal issue presented by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Thompson v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Smude v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Arendt & Wartman v. VossenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Hayle Floor Covering, Inc. v. First Minnesota Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC v. CopoulsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API