Legal Opinion

Miller v. McGill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1933No. 2338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512OPINION

By BARNES, J.

On hearing, the court overruled defendant’s request to open up judgment and permit the filing of answer. Thereafter motion for new trial was filed and overruled. A bill of exceptions is presented which purports to contain the proceedings attending the hearing on defendant’s motion to open up the judgment and permit the filing of answer. This bill of exceptions contains nothing except the trial statement of counsel and questions and rulings by the court.

The answer as presented, if proven, contains a complete defense and under the circumstances we think the court was in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canal Winchester Bank v. ExlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Lutkenhouse v. VellaOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Canal Winchester Bank v. ExlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Sarchet v. BunnOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API