Legal Opinion

United States v. Blankenship

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 31, 1956No. 8026PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief'Judge:

A general court-martial in Japan convicted the accused of premeditated murder (Charge I) and assault with the intent to commit murder (Charge II), in violation of Articles 118 and 134, *330Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 712 and § 728, respectively. It adjudged a sentence which includes confinement at hard labor for life. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed. We granted review.

At the end of the working day on January 20, 1955; Sergeants Thaxton and Argyle engaged in some drinking at the NCO Club at Itami Air Base. Later, they…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CarverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. SearsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  2. United States v. ErbUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. PapenheimUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. MarshallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API