State v. Edwards

After the overruling of a motion to suppress, appellant entered a plea of no contest to aggravated robbery and was sentenced.

The appellant was observed by a Rilce’s security employee as appellant placed articles of clothing in a shopping bag. He was detained and-when he was patted down a .38 caliber revolver was removed from his pocket.

I

Appellant argues for his first assignment that the removal of the clothing from the shopping bag was an -unlawful. search and that his motion to suppress should have been sustained. There is no merit to this assignment.

We may .commence with the “plain view”…