Legal Opinion
State v. Wharf
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1999No. 1998-1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 375.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WHARF, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wharf,
1999-Ohio-112.] Criminal law—Robbery—Deadly weapon element of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1) does not require the mens rea of recklessness—It is not necessary to prove a specific mental state regarding the deadly weapon element of the offense of robbery to establish a violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1). 1. The deadly weapon element of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1), to wit, “[h]ave a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the offender’s control[,]”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MerriweatherOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Pond, 91061 (2-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Canyon, C-070729 (3-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Jones, 07-Ma-200 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Lucas, 2007ca00292 (1-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Williamson, 22878 (11-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.