Legal Opinion

State v. Lester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. 2008-1725PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} The issue before us is whether, in the crime of aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), the element of brandishing, displaying, using, or *397indicating possession of a deadly weapon has a mens rea of recklessness, or whether strict liability is imposed with regard to that element. We conclude that R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) imposes strict liability for that element. Consequently, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment.

I

A

{¶ 2} James Lester and an unnamed accomplice stole money from three men by drawing the victims into playing three-card monte. One of the victims (“victim two”)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. HornerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WessonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. State v. DiggsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API