Legal Opinion

State v. Wharf

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1999No. 98-1925PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The question certified by the court of appeals is “whether R.C. 2901.21(B) requires the particular robbery element, codified in R.C. 2911.02(A)(1), ‘[h]ave a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the offender’s control,’ to be committed with the mens rea of recklessness.” In other words, the issue presented for our determination is whether robbery, as defined by R.C. 2911.02(A)(1), requires that, in order to prove the deadly weapon element of the offense, it is necessary that the defendant had recklessness as a state of mind.

*377R.C. 2901.21 provides in relevant part:

“(A)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MerriweatherOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. HornerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. Ferguson, 07ap-640 (7-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API