Rice v. National City
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
—The plaintiffs, taxpayers of National City, brought this action against said city, and Samuel W. Smith as city marshal, and also against the city clerk and treasurer, to enjoin them from paying said city marshal the sum of twenty-five dollars per month, that being the salary fixed by a certain ordinance which plaintiffs contend increased the salary of the marshal after his term of office commenced.
The defendants demurred to the complaint for want of facts, and their demurrer having been overruled, declined to answer, and now appeal from the judgment thereupon entered.
Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Sweet v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People ex rel. Hinton v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Dillon v. BicknellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chenoweth v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lungren v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Norton v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Castree v. SlingerlandNew York Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.