Norton v. Lewis
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner appeals to this court from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate. Respondent claims that petitioner is entitled to a salary of only $250 per month (three thousand dollars per year), and that petitioner is merely holding over as incumbent of a term which began in January, 1913. Petitioner claims that he is in office for a term beginning on the first Monday after the first day of January, 1917, and that therefore his salary, as established by law, is five thousand dollars per year. Counsel for respondent, in their brief, have furnished us with a copy of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People ex rel. Fleming v. ShorbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Tracy v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lungren v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hulbert v. CraigNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. County EngineerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hill v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.