People v. Edwards
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Quo warranto ex relatione T. J. Parsons to show by what warrant defendant exercises the office of fire commissioner.
The facts —about which there is no dispute — are as follows: Prior to 1878 the board of fire commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco consisted of five persons, chosen by the qualified voters of said city and county at general elections. On March 28, 1878, an act was passed by the legislature, and approved by the governor, which provided for a board of fire commissioners consisting of five members, three of whom should be appointed by the board of supervisors, one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Gosman v. State ex rel. SchumacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- People ex rel. Melony v. WhitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Standish v. BoucherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- People ex rel. Sweet v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.