Legal Opinion

People v. J.S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2014No. E058471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J .

While imprisoned after being convicted of several offenses, defendant J.S. was declared a mentally disordered offender (MDO) pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 2962. On March 6, 2012, J.S. was placed on parole and began her initial one-year term of involuntary treatment. After the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) rejected her challenge to her MDO classification and initial commitment, she filed a petition requesting counsel and judicial review, pursuant to section 2966, subdivision (b). That petition, however, was not heard within the initial year of commitment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Woodward Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Garreks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. ConcepcionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. Pipkin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Conservatorship of T.M.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. J.T. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API