Legal Opinion

People v. Concepcion

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2008No. S146288PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Under Penal Code section 1043, subdivision (b)(2),1 a noncapital felony trial may continue in a defendant’s absence, if the defendant was present when trial began, then later voluntarily absents himself.

Defendant’s jury had been sworn, but on the morning of the first day evidence was to be taken, he escaped before court convened. Several hours later he was apprehended in a nearby community and the court was informed he could be returned to court the following morning. That afternoon the trial proceeded in his absence.

A divided Court of Appeal reversed, reasoning that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. HAJJAJCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API