Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Ellis and Langston
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
Bert Ellis and Ralph Langston, in separate petitions, seek relief under the Habeas Corpus Act. The petitions in substance are indentical. The Ellis petition or case is numbered 4429 .and the Langston case is numbered 4430. Both eases were heard as one and are so briefed, and are so interrelated that a separate consideration is not necessary, hence we shall consider them together.
Petitioners allege that they are unlawfully deprived of their liberty by S. PI. Kincannon, messenger,' appointed by the Governor of Arkansas, and Alfred Owen, Sheriff of Greene county, Missouri. Petitions were filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Munsey v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cook v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex parte MontgomeryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Keeton Ex Rel. Tomassone v. GaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- State ex rel. Anderson v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Tinajero v. SchweitzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lindley v. CriderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.