Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Ratiner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 30, 2010No. SC08-689PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that respondent Robert Joseph Ratiner, a member of The Florida Bar since 1990, be found guilty of professional misconduct and disciplined. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

For the reasons explained below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations as to guilt. We also approve the mitigating factors and the aggravating factors found by the referee. With regard to discipline, however, we disapprove the referee’s alternative recommendations of disbarment or a two-year suspension. Instead, we impose a public…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. The Florida Bar v. TobkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. DeBock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. NorkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Security National Bank v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
  3. Florida Bar v. GwynnSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. The Florida Bar v. Jacqueline Marie KinsellaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. SidranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API