Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Pahules

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 18, 1970No. 38959PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

233 So.2d 130 (1970)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Gregory M. PAHULES, Respondent.

No. 38959.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 18, 1970.

James E. Glass, Miami, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Harold Peter Barkas, Miami, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This is a proceeding to discipline Gregory M. Pahules, who is accused of mishandling trust funds held by him for his client, Mrs. Sarah Gledhill Thacher. Respondent was adjudged guilty by The Florida Bar, and was ordered disbarred from the practice of law; he brought timely appeal to this Court, pursuant to Rule 11.08, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A.

No…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. DawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. RuskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. The Florida Bar v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. The Florida Bar v. BreedSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. The Florida Bar v. ClementSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. The Florida Bar v. LawlessSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. The Florida Bar v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API