Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Viking Fire Protection Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
In this action plaintiff, Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company, sought to restrain defendant, Viking Fire Protection Company, from doing business in this state under that name. Intervenor, The Viking Corporation, sought damages from plaintiff for its use of the term “Viking” in its business name and to restrain it from such use in the future. Defendant and intervenor appeal from a judgment of the Ramsey County District Court in plaintiff’s favor.
If all conflicts in the evidence are resolved in favor of the prevailing party below, the facts appear to be as follows: Plaintiff is a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Kipp v. ClingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bolduc v. New York Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Kleidon v. GlascockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.