Bolduc v. New York Fire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to collect insurance alleged to be due under a contract with the defendant company. The trial court found that there was at the time of the collision involved an existing contract of insurance; that a pile driver oriented and operated by the plaintiffs was clearly subject matter within the terms of the insurance contract; that the pile driver which was damaged was damaged within the terms of the insurance contract, while in force; and that the accident came within the provisions of the insurance contract, subject to the deduction of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hammer v. Malkerson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Struble v. Occidental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Costello v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.