Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal of Rocheleau
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 28, 2004No. A03-2046PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Relators challenge a decision by the Carver County Board of Commissioners affirming Carver County Environmental Services’ decision that relators’ septic system had the potential to immediately threaten public health or safety and requiring them to submit a new design for a replacement septic system. Relators argue that (1) the county ordinance is preempted by state law; (2) the board’s decision is unreasonable, oppressive, arbitrary, without evidentiary support, and based on an erroneous theory of law; (3) the relevant statute violates the separation-of-powers clause…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Jennissen v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014