Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Jones' Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 30, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. In the former opinion, which may be found in 171 Ky. 11, the facts are stated very fully, and it will be necessary to repeat only such of them here as will serve to point out the grounds upon which a reversal is sought.

Jones was a member of a crew of section men engaged in repairing the tracks of the appellant company, and in the course of this work he was using a heavy jack. The place where the men were at work was protected from passing trains by a green flag put out on each side a sufficient distance to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Skinner's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Jones' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Asher's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Director General of Railroads v. Chapman's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Ohio Valley Electric Railway Co. v. Brumfield's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Northern Railway Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Maggard's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API