Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Maggard's Administrator
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeals from Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*260Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas
Reversing the judgment in the first case, and affirming the one in the second case.
W. Harrison Maggard, a single man about 27' years of age, was employed by defendant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, as night telegraph operator at its depot station in Prestonsburg, Ky. At about 8:45 o ’clock on the evening of March 8, 1916, which was nearly two hours after he had gone on duty for the night, he undertook to signal a passing freight train (which was a part of his duties) and in doing so he used a swinging electric light suspended from the ceiling and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Director General of Railroads v. Chapman's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926