Legal Opinion

State v. Holloway, 86426 (5-10-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2007No. Nos. 86426/86427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause is before this Court on remand from the Supreme Court of Ohio. In State v. Holloway, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86426 and 86427,2006-Ohio-2591, we held that the trial court's failure to advise Holloway that his post-release control was mandatory rendered his plea invalid. As a result of our holding, we declined to address the remaining assigned errors because they were moot.

{¶ 2} In Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the failure to inform a defendant of the mandatory nature of post-release control did not render the plea or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Duran v. KelseyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Douglas, Unpublished Decision (11-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Witherspoon, 90498 (8-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Holloway, 91005 (1-8-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API