State v. Holloway, 86426 (5-10-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} This cause is before this Court on remand from the Supreme Court of Ohio. In State v. Holloway, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86426 and 86427,2006-Ohio-2591, we held that the trial court's failure to advise Holloway that his post-release control was mandatory rendered his plea invalid. As a result of our holding, we declined to address the remaining assigned errors because they were moot.
{¶ 2} In Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the failure to inform a defendant of the mandatory nature of post-release control did not render the plea or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Duran v. KelseyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Douglas, Unpublished Decision (11-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Witherspoon, 90498 (8-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Holloway, 91005 (1-8-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009