Legal Opinion

State v. Witherspoon, 90498 (8-14-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2008No. 90498UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Levy Witherspoon appeals his plea to two counts of escape and the accompanying sentence. Both escape charges arose from Witherspoon's violation of postrelease control. He sets forth the following three errors for our review:

"I. The trial court erred by convicting appellant of two counts of escape where the postrelease control that formed the basis of the escape charges was invalid and could not support the charges of escape."
"II. Appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel provided by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. ChionchioOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Cornwall v. Sutula (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API