Legal Opinion

Merriman v. Sandeen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1978No. 47730, 47754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying motions for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment or a new trial. The district court sitting without a jury determined that plaintiff’s tender of a check which was dishonored by the drawee bank caused the lapse of the option to purchase defendants’ land. Plaintiff originally sued for specific performance. With the consent of defendants, a claim for compensatory damages was added. At trial plaintiff dropped his claim for specific performance. Because the trial court found that the option had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Olsen v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Viking Fire Protection Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schafer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Ward v. Federal Kemper InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Johnson Motor Co., Inc. v. CueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Sieren v. American Family Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API