Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Gilberto Uresti, Movant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1984No. 83-2163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge:

Movant-Appellant Gilberto Uresti (Ures-ti) timely appeals two orders of the District Court: (1) A denial of Uresti’s motion to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of his campaign banking papers and records; and (2) A denial of Uresti’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion 1 for the return of the same papers and records later seized from his person pursuant to a search warrant.

As an alternate to the appeal, Uresti petitions for a writ of mandamus commanding the District Court to correct the alleged errors in entering each of the orders of denial.

We note…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Joseph W. Richey and Wife, Blanche Richey v. Jack E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Alliedsignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re: Red Barn Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. In re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney Representing Criminal Reyes-RequenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Floyd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API