In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Gilberto Uresti, Movant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge:
Movant-Appellant Gilberto Uresti (Ures-ti) timely appeals two orders of the District Court: (1) A denial of Uresti’s motion to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of his campaign banking papers and records; and (2) A denial of Uresti’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion 1 for the return of the same papers and records later seized from his person pursuant to a search warrant.
As an alternate to the appeal, Uresti petitions for a writ of mandamus commanding the District Court to correct the alleged errors in entering each of the orders of denial.
We note…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Joseph W. Richey and Wife, Blanche Richey v. Jack E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shanks v. Alliedsignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Red Barn Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney Representing Criminal Reyes-RequenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Floyd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.