Legal Opinion

Joseph W. Richey and Wife, Blanche Richey v. Jack E. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1975No. 74-2178PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:

The appellants, J. W. and Blanche Ri-chey, husband and wife (hereinafter Taxpayers), sued in the district court under Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., for the return of property and suppression of evidence, business records of the husband, seized by Special Agent Jack Smith of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The complaint alleged that Special Agent Smith obtained possession of the records of Mr. Richey’s business in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. Prior to any hearing on the merits the district court declared itself without jurisdiction of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Samuel KamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Premises Known as 608 Taylor Ave., Apartment 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Appeal of Harold MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Luis Mora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API