Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Qualls, Inc. v. Berryman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1990No. 89SA63Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Erickson

specially concurring:

I concur with the result reached by the majority. I have specially concurred to emphasize the limited statutory and constitutional issues that are before us in this appeal where the attorney general elected not to enter an appearance. This opinion addresses only section 37-92-305(11), 15 C.R.S. (1989 Supp.), and the appropriation of nontributary ground water that is not in a designated ground water basin. In my view, the water court had statutory authority to retain jurisdiction over the case pursuant to section 37-92-305(11). The water court did not, in my opinion,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. People v. HeartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Moore v. Chalmers-Galloway Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API