Legal Opinion
People v. Hearty
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 19, 1982No. 81SA539-81SA542PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
Pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 the People in this interlocutory appeal challenge a suppression ruling entered in the course of a pending criminal case in which the defendant-appel-lees, David Iden, Richard Hearty and Antonio Amezquita, have been charged by indictment with criminal extortion, 1 theft, 2 and conspiracy to commit extortion, 3 during the period between March 8 and March 25, 1981. The evidence suppressed by the district court was seized pursuant to search warrants from the residence of Iden and from the office of an attorney who previously represented Iden and Hearty. 4 The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. TambeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. MelgosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.