Legal Opinion
Moore v. Chalmers-Galloway Live Stock Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 18, 1932No. 12,712PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
The parties hereto are hereinafter designated as the receiver and the Chalmers company respectively. The property involved is referred to as the placer, the Reserve Mining Company as the Reserve company, John Fortune as Fortune, and William Monaghan as Monaghan.
The Chalmers company had judgment quieting its title to the placer. The receiver, on the ground that neither he nor the Reserve company were served or appeared therein, moved to vacate as to him. His motion was sustained, he answered, and issue was joined. On the trial he had the affirmative, and at the close of his counsel’s opening…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Denver, South Park & Pacific Railway Co. v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Ezell v. Rocky Mountain Bean & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Benner v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- British America Assurance Co. v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. D.K.B.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Jefferson County Department of Social Services v. D.A.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.