Legal Opinion
United States v. Abu Marzook
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 31, 2006No. 03 CR 0978PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EYE, District Judge.
On August 19, 2004, a Grand Jury returned a multiple-count, second superseding indictment (the “Indictment”) against Defendant Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah (“Defendant” or “Salah”) and his co-defendants. Defendant Salah has filed a motion to suppress statements he allegedly made to Israeli authorities. Salah argues that he did not voluntarily make any statements that the government seeks to admit at trial. The United States has filed a motion to conduct certain portions of the suppression hearing in a closed courtroom, pursuant to the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- United States v. MarzookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. MarzookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. Holy Land Fdn for ReliefCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.