Legal Opinion

United States v. Marzook

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 8, 2006No. 03 CR 978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ST. EVE, District Judge.

On August 19, 2004, a Grand Jury returned a multiple-count, second superseding indictment (the “Indictment”) against Defendant Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah (“Defendant” or “Salah”), also known as Abu Ahmad, and his co-defendants, Mousa Mohammed Abu Marzook and Abdelha-leem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar. Defendant Salah has filed a motion to suppress statements he allegedly made to Israeli authorities in 1993 on the basis that he did not voluntarily make any of the statements which the government seeks to admit at trial. Defendant Salah argues that…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Alexander BebrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. Norton v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. SNMP Research, Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
  5. United States v. SalahDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API