Legal Opinion
Bowers v. Whitman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2012No. 10-35966, 10-36029PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, we determine whether the State of Oregon and Jackson County (collectively Oregon) committed a constitutional taking, violated Plaintiffs’ due process rights, or violated Plaintiffs’ equal protection rights when Oregon voters enacted Measure 49 to replace and modify remedies available under the previous Measure 37. We conclude that Oregon did not commit a constitutional taking when it modified the remedies available under Measure 37, because any potential property interest that Plaintiffs had for compensation or a specific type of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Slidewaters LLC v. Washington State Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Angelotti Chiropractic v. Christine BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Geiger v. KitzhaberDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- McCutchen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.