Legal Opinion
Roe v. Sugar River Mills Associates
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 12, 1993No. Civ. 91-393-MPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
Plaintiff resides at Sugar River Mills apartment complex in Claremont, New Hampshire. Sugar River Mills is the largest federally subsidized housing complex in Western New Hampshire. It is comprised of approximately 130 tenants occupying 111 units. Defendant, Sugar River Mills Associates, owns and operates the apartment complex. Defendant, MB Management Corporation of Boston, Massachusetts, is the managing agent.
Plaintiff asserts that defendants’ conduct toward him violates provisions of the Fair Housing Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619 (1990) (the “Act”).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Roe v. Housing Authority of City of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Boston Housing Authority v. BridgewatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.