Legal Opinion
Roe v. Housing Authority of City of Boulder
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 26, 1995No. 94-B-2033PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant Housing Authority of the City of Boulder (BHA) and the City of Boulder (City) move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on the claims of plaintiff, Leonard Roe (Roe) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (ADA), the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. (FHAA), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 794, 794a (Rehab Act). The City also seeks dismissal of the claims against it pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b). Also pending is Roe’s motion…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Boston Housing Authority v. BridgewatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.