Legal Opinion
Wilson v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 16, 1992No. 92-616PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in its decision granting summary judgment to General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. (GECAL) and Jones Toyota Volvo (Jones) on a contract to lease. We find no error and affirm.
In February, 1987, Robert and Cindy Wilson signed a contract to lease a 1987 Toyota Camry from Jones for a period of five years. The contract was later assigned to GECAL.
The Wilsons claimed that Jones’ leasing manager, Cliff Wright, made false representations to them that they could return the car to the dealership in three years,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. HartjeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas v. SessionsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- McKneely v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Talbot v. JansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Hughes v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Deanna Slagle Roberts v. Darryl Francis, M.D. St. Edward Mercy Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Varner v. Peterson FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.