Legal Opinion

Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90-391CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This contractual dispute is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to USCC Rule 56.1 For the reasons stated herein, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed.

Facts

Plaintiff, Wm. T. Thompson Company (Thompson), was a manufacturer in the mid to late 1960’s of a product known as Agent Orange, which was used for military pur*20poses by the United States Government as a defoliant during the Vietnam War. Years later, Vietnam veterans and their families, alleging that exposure…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API