Great Northern Railway Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The facts are not in dispute. At the hearing before the Industrial Commission the parties entered into a written stipulation of facts. They are in substance as follows:
Plaintiff is a common carrier by railroad, operating an extensive railroad system from the city of Superior, Wisconsin, westward through various other states to the North Pacific coast. As a part of its railroad, system it owns and operates four ore docks in the city of Superior, which are used exclusively for the interstate transportation of iron ore. All of the ore handled on the four docks is transported in ore cars by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- New York Central Railroad v. MarconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Piggue v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. PottsTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maxie v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Zimmermann v. ScandrettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- Matter of Baird v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ernhart v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.