Legal Opinion

Lefkoff v. Sicro

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1942No. 13958, 13961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. "When the issues of both law and fact in an equity cause are referred to an auditor," he "takes the place of the jury and the judge, and is pro hac vice the chancellor. To his report exceptions can be filed, to be separately classified as exceptions of law and exceptions of fact. [Code, § 10-301.] When exceptions of law are filed, they are for the exclusive consideration of the judge. [§ 10-401.] In equitable proceedings, if exceptions of fact are filed, and the judge approves the same, the same shall be submitted to the jury." § 10-402. Wiley v. Sparta, 154 Ga. 1, 23 (114 S.E. 45).

2. "The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Carter & Woolfolk v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Laramore v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Asbury v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Tovell v. LegumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. United Bonded Warehouse Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Franklin v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Carr v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API