Legal Opinion

Asbury v. McCall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1947No. 15788PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Presiding Justice.

1. The final report of the examiner in, the present land-registration case reciting that the evidence did not disclose that the objectors had any interest in the land, such finding unexcepted to in this- respect became binding upon all parties to the litigation. Carter v. Jackson, 115 Ga. 676 (1) (42 S. E. 46); Barber v. Southern Service Corp., 182 Ga. 124, 127 (185 S. E. 93); Lefkoff v. Sicro, 193 Ga. 292 (2) (18 S. E. 2d, 464). Having no interest in the land, the objectors were without authority to contest the right of the applicant to a decree of registration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Carter & Woolfolk v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Laramore v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Barber v. Southern Service Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Associated Companies, Inc. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. City of Marietta v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. McCook v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Johnson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. McCook v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API