United Bonded Warehouse Inc. v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
This court has repeatedly attempted to emphasize the imperative necessity of strict adherence to the general rule that, before an unsecured creditor will be permitted to obtain an injunction, receivership, or other equitable relief, it must be made clearly to appear that there is a present manifest wrong or injury imminently impending. Crawford v. Ross, 39 Ga. 44; Jones v. Wilson, 195 Ga. 310 (24 S. E. 2d, 34; Irwin v. Willis, 202 Ga. 463 (43 S. E. 2d, 691.) In the case last cited, attention was called to the constitutional mandate that the citizen or his property be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Crawford v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Mendenhall v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Irwin v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cleveland v. TullySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Walls v. SavageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Frankel v. FrankelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- United Bonded Warehouse Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Rabun v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.