Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1931No. 413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is closely akin to No. 414, Taylor v. Tayrien et al. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 884, just decided. The only difference is that the bankrupt is not a member of the Osage Tribe, but is a Kaw allottee, of less than half Indian blood with a certificate of competency. She inherited one-half of an Osage headlight. There were no annuity payments to her credit at the time of her adjudication.

The decision in No. 414 governs this appeal. The Osage acts contemplated that headrights might pass to others than members of the tribe, for it was known that Osages married out of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Motte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Taylor v. TayrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Drummond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. West v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Taylor v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Eckelt v. HerrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API