Legal Opinion
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Bruce
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1935No. 1276, 1277PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by C. L. Bruce, individually and as next friend for his minor children, Robert C. Bruce and Charles Neal Bruce, and his minor step-children, Marie Bowman LaSarge and Virgie Bowman, against the Globe Indemnity Company, the surety on the administrator’s bond of A. Wade Patton, former administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Maude Bruce, the deceased wife of C. L. Bruce and mother of the minors above named.’
Maude Bruce was a duly enrolled and allotted member of the Osage Tribe. She was of less than one-half degree Indian blood and possessed a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Taylor v. TayrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- West v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Smith Ex Rel. State v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Bell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.