Legal Opinion

Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 1916No. 322PublishedCited by 40 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT 'OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. The facts, which involve rights of' a white heir of an Osage Lidian to the allotment of the latter, and the construction of the Act of June 28, 1906, under which the allotment was made, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

Charles Coleman, the defendant in error, brought this suit to set aside a conveyance of an undivided interest in lands inherited from his Indian wife and child who were members of the Osage Tribe. Judgment was entered annulling the conveyance upon the ground that it was executed in violation of restrictions imposed by Congress. The judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State (43 Oklahoma, 13), and this writ of error has been sued out.

The case was decided upon a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and there were special findings of the facts which the pleadings disclosed. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. La Motte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Talley v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. West v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API