Legal Opinion

Lippman v. Cort

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1927No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff purchased a vendee’s interest in a land contract. The vendor gave notice of for feiture for nonpayment of installments and commenced a summary proceeding before a circuit court commissioner to obtain possession. The circuit court commissioner found the forfeiture and the amount due under the contract and awarded possession of the premises to the vendor. The statute gave plaintiff herein 30 days in which to pay the sum found due and save 'his rights under the contract. Plaintiff, instead of paying, took an appeal to the circuit court. In the circuit judgment was rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Drake v. LippmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Smith v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. C. & OR CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API