Legal Opinion

Drake v. Lippman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On August 6, 1920, plaintiffs entered into a contract with Harry Cook and Catherine Cook, his wife, to sell them certain lots on Scotten avenue in Detroit for $7,000. There was a down-payment of $1,500 with agreed monthly payments of $40. The Cooks were given possession, and the contract contained the usual provision for forfeiture for failure to make payments. March 8,1924, the' Cooks assigned their equity to defendant Lippman. He gave notice of the assignment of the contract to him and in turn was notified that the contract was at default. At this time there were past due monthly payments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Zadigian v. GardMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Letinsky v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Fry v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spellman v. Dundalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Ashworth v. HankinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lippman v. CortMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Walker v. LindMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API