Goltz v. Besarick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
There was evidence that the plaintiff’s intestate, a pedestrian on a public way, was struck on August 6, 1939, by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The intestate died on August 8, 1939. The declaration contains two counts, the first being to recover damages for the death under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 229, § 5, as amended by St. 1937, c. 406, § 3 (see St. 1941, c. 504, § 3), and the second count being to recover damages for conscious suffering, of which there was evidence. There was testimony from physicians who attended the deceased that trauma *15was an adequate cause for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Lamoureux v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Commonwealth v. PinnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Haven v. Town of BrimfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Steckman v. Silver Moon, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.