Legal Opinion

Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 22, 1914PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action in tort or contract which comes before us on report from a judge of the Superior Court,* who overruled the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration.

The first count in the declaration alleges in substance that the defendant, a railroad corporation, negligently delivered a loaded coal car owned by it to the plaintiff, a cotton manufacturer, *583knowing that the plaintiff in the ordinary course of its business would move the car by horses on tracks upon its premises, there unload and return it to the defendant; that the car was in a defective condition, whereby, while…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API