Legal Opinion

Jahn v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1922No. 17248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— Appellants are contractors engaged in the performance of contracts for the city of Seattle on local improvement work, and they allege in their complaint against the city that they estimated their costs on the basis of $3.50 per day for common labor to be employed by them, and that, at the time of the execution of the contracts, there was in effect a charter provision of the city of Seattle, art. 23, § 2, of which reads as follows:

“Minimum Wage to be Paid on local or other improvement Work: Every contractor and sub-contractor performing any local or other improvement work for the City of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Crane v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Vail v. SeaborgWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Raines v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cornelius v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Seattle High School Chapter No. 200 v. SharplesWashington Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API