Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Raines v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1925No. 19060. Department TwoPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The first named and about sixty other appellants, as relators, and the intervener, as a taxpayer of Seattle, waged this action to compel by mandate the civil service commission of Seattle and the superintendent of the municipal street railways of Seattle to retain in the employ of the city the relators, upon the ground that they were being unlawfully dismissed from employment as trainmen by reason of the unlawful operation of a “veterans’ preference” conferred by charter amendment No. 11 of the civil service rules of Seattle. The intervener alleged as a taxpayer that the threatened dismissal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Matter of Barthelmess v. . CukorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. People ex rel. Sellers v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jahn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Weyant v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. SchmidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Rubin Ramírez v. Trías MongeSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981
  4. Koelfgen v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  5. Feinerman v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API