Legal Opinion

Porter v. Puryear

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1953No. A-4238PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

Monte Puryear, as plaintiff, sought by his suit against Dr. G. G. Porter and Dr. J. A. Finer, osteopathic physicians, and T. W. Baker, the three defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries growing out of the alleged negligence of Baker in injecting a spinal anesthetic into plaintiff’s spine somewhere between the first lumbar and sixth dorsal vertebrae. In response to jury findings on special issues the trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff for the sum of $134,800.00. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for retrial. 258 S.W. 2d 182.

Both the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Holcomb v. LorinoTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Phoenix Refining Co. v. TipsTexas Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Webb v. JornsTexas Supreme Court · 1972

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API